You’re not imagining it: sorting a fridge repair feels harder than replacing a toaster. One reader, Sera from Tauranga, booked a “quick regas” for a leaky fridge. It cooled for a week, then died on a long weekend, taking $300 of food with it. The kicker? The tech wasn’t licensed to handle refrigerant, and the scrap yard vented the gas. Illegal, and expensive in more ways than one.

\n\n

\n \n

A licensed technician should recover and document refrigerant work.

\n \n\n

Here’s the surprise: with fridges, the biggest decision isn’t the brand or even the price of the repair. It’s whether the person touching your sealed system is licensed and following the rules. In Australia that’s black‑and‑white law. In New Zealand, it’s rapidly becoming the same story under the Cool‑Safe stewardship scheme (dcceew.gov.au; environment.govt.nz).

\n\n

Are you focusing on the wrong thing when you book a repair?

\n\n

Most of us zero in on speed and cost: “Who can get here today and do it cheap?” That’s the trap. Your fridge is a pressure vessel full of a controlled substance. “Just topping up the gas” without finding the leak isn’t maintenance-it’s a red flag. Sealed systems don’t consume refrigerant; loss means a leak that must be found and fixed.

\n\n

Think of refrigerant like the brake fluid in a car. If it’s disappearing, you don’t top it up and hope-you fix the leak before someone gets hurt. Same with fridges: leaks waste money, shorten compressor life, and, if mishandled, can be illegal to release (dcceew.gov.au).

\n\n

Better questions to ask:

What licence or accreditation will the technician use for refrigerant recovery and repairs? (ARC in Australia; Cool‑Safe recognition in NZ) (dcceew.gov.au; coolsafe.org.nz)
Does the quote include leak detection and documented recovery, not just a “regas”? (fridgerepairs.net.au)
How old is my fridge, and does this repair make sense versus the energy savings and reliability of a newer unit? (choice.com.au)

\n\n

What does the law actually require in AU/NZ?

\n\n

Here’s where the “I didn’t know that” moments kick in:

Refrigerant handling is controlled. In Australia, a Refrigerant Handling Licence is required to recover, repair, or charge systems using synthetic greenhouse gases (HFCs) or ozone‑depleting substances. Businesses trading refrigerant need an Authorisation (dcceew.gov.au). The Australian Refrigeration Council administers licences; specialist “Green Scheme” accreditation covers hydrocarbons like R‑290 propane (arcltd.org.au).
New Zealand has accredited Cool‑Safe to run a national product stewardship scheme. As regulations roll out, only recognised technicians/collectors will be allowed to buy, recover, and dispose of synthetic refrigerants, with mandatory reporting (environment.govt.nz; coolsafe.org.nz).
HFCs are being phased down. Australia is restricting high‑GWP refrigerants in some new equipment from 2024/2025, shifting markets to lower‑GWP alternatives. That influences future servicing and parts choices (dcceew.gov.au).

\n\n

Costs of getting it wrong:

A “regas” without leak repair often fails quickly. You’ll pay twice and keep emitting refrigerant (fridgerepairs.net.au).
Financially, common repairs in Australia run roughly: door seals AUD 50-300; thermostats/defrost AUD 100-400; fan motors AUD 150-500; refrigerant top‑up AUD 150-350 (no leak fix); leak find + repair AUD 400-800; compressor/sealed‑system rebuild AUD 600-1,200+ (domestic; more for commercial). NZ pricing is similar in scale, with regional variation (fridgerepairs.net.au; whybuy.com.au).
Repair vs replace tipping point: if the quote exceeds 40-50% of a new equivalent-or if the fridge is 8-10+ years old with a sealed‑system failure-replacement is often smarter, and newer units can slash energy costs (choice.com.au).

\n\n

What’s at stake for your home or business?

\n\n

Picture Friday night before a kids’ party. The fridge’s hum becomes a strange buzz. Milk turns overnight, ice cream slumps, and tomorrow’s platter becomes a dash to the servo. You’re binning food, the house smells off, and you’re copping the “We told you to book it earlier” look.

\n\n

Now flip it. You ring a licensed tech, who asks smart questions, checks seals and coils, and finds a tiny evaporator leak. They recover refrigerant, fix the leak, evacuate and recharge properly, and leave a service report. No drama, no repeat visits, and no arguing about warranties later.

\n\n

For businesses-cafés, dairies, bottle shops-the stakes are higher: stock loss, downtime, and food‑safety risks. One poorly handled repair can create a failure at 6 am on Saturday and a mountain of waste. Keeping your cool isn’t just convenience-it’s cashflow and reputation.

\n\n

How do you choose the right path without overpaying?

\n\n

Here’s the new way to think about fridge servicing. Use the CHILL framework:

\n\n

C Compliance: Only licensed/recognised technicians handle refrigerant. In Australia, ask for their ARC licence number; in NZ, ask about Cool‑Safe recognition or refrigerant‑handling competency (dcceew.gov.au; coolsafe.org.nz)
H History: Age, past repairs, and energy rating. A 10‑year‑old unit with two major faults is a replacement candidate (choice.com.au)
I Impact: Energy use, downtime risk, food loss, and environmental impact of leaks. A “cheap” top‑up can cost more in repeat callouts and emissions (fridgerepairs.net.au)
L Lifecycle: Availability of parts/refrigerant, and where the market is heading (lower‑GWP refrigerants, different service skills) (dcceew.gov.au)
L Logistics: Access, moving, and end‑of‑life. If tipped or laid down, wait 4-24 hours before powering up so oil drains back into the compressor-check your manual (fr.scribd.com). For disposal, insist on certified recovery (coolsafe.org.nz; dcceew.gov.au)

\n\n

\n \n

Documentation and correct recovery procedures are central to a proper repair.

\n \n\n

Questions to ask any repairer or retailer:

Who is doing the work and what’s their licence/accreditation?
Will you perform leak detection and provide documentation of recovery/repairs?
Are parts OEM or reputable aftermarket, and what’s the parts/labour warranty?
What’s the total price, including diagnostics, refrigerant, and return visits if required?

\n\n

What exactly should you do next?

\n\n

\n Triage and record:\n Note the model/serial, symptoms, when it started, and take photos/video. This speeds diagnosis and supports consumer‑law claims if needed (consumerprotection.govt.nz).\n
\n Decide if it’s likely a DIY fix or needs a tech:\n You can clean condenser coils, clear vents, level the unit, replace a door seal, and defrost a manual freezer. Many cooling issues vanish after a coil clean and new gasket (consumerprotection.govt.nz). If cooling is weak, the compressor is short‑cycling, there’s frost on one corner of the evaporator, or you hear hissing-call a licensed tech. Sealed‑system work must not be DIY (dcceew.govt.au).\n
\n Choose the right technician:\n Australia: Insist on an ARC‑licensed tech for any refrigerant work; ask for their licence number and a written quote (dcceew.govt.au). New Zealand: Use a Cool‑Safe recognised/qualified tech or a technician who can demonstrate refrigerant‑handling competency. Ask for written scope, including recovery and leak detection (coolsafe.org.nz).\n
\n Compare two quotes:\n Good quotes itemise diagnostic fee, labour rate, parts (with part numbers/brand), refrigerant recovery and leak detection, repair warranty length, and ETA. Vague quotes invite repeat visits and finger‑pointing later.\n
\n Apply repair vs replace logic:\n Repair if: it’s under 8-10 years old, the fridge is otherwise sound, and the repair is under ~40-50% of a comparable new unit. Replace if: sealed‑system/compressor failure on an older unit, multiple major faults, or high energy use. Consider running costs and the likelihood of future refrigerant/parts availability (choice.com.au; hospitalityconnect.com.au).\n
\n Protect your rights (and avoid traps):\n Don’t accept “Your warranty is void if you use a third‑party repairer.” Statutory consumer guarantees under the ACL/CGA override unfair terms, though you may need certified parts/authorised service for some manufacturer warranties (consumersfederation.org.au; consumerprotection.govt.nz). Push back on “quick regas.” Ask for leak detection, repair, and a service report. Top‑ups without a fix are usually short‑lived and can be unlawful if they cause releases (fridgerepairs.net.au; dcceew.govt.au). Beware cheap, unbranded parts. Insist on OEM or reputable aftermarket with a written parts warranty (industrykitchens.com.au).\n
\n Moving or disposing? Don’t create a new problem:\n If the fridge was tipped or laid down in transit, wait per the manual-often 4-24 hours-before switching on (fr.scribd.com). For end‑of‑life, never allow venting. Use Cool‑Safe/recognised collectors in NZ or authorised services in Australia. Ask for a recovery/destruction receipt (coolsafe.org.nz; dcceew.gov.au).\n
\n For businesses:\n Document stock loss (photos, dates, receipts). You may claim under consumer law or insurance if a major failure or defective repair caused spoilage (consumerprotection.govt.nz). Schedule preventative maintenance: coil cleans, door seal checks, airflow clearances. It’s cheaper than one emergency callout.\n

\n\n

The bottom line

If a repair touches refrigerant, you’re not buying minutes of labour-you’re buying compliance, safety, and future reliability. Start with licences, not price. Reject shortcuts like “quick regas.” Use CHILL to weigh repair vs replace, and document everything. Do that, and you’ll spend less over the life of the appliance, avoid legal and environmental traps, and keep your cool when it counts (dcceew.govt.au; coolsafe.org.nz).

Fridge Fixes: Licence Over Low Price